What’s Grizzly Bear Stewardship Framework questionnaire actually for?

Article content material

It’s been simply over a 12 months since David Eby grew to become premier of B.C., lengthy sufficient for me to conclude that the atmosphere is just not one in all his priorities.

Till final week’s welcome cope with Ottawa to guard 30 p.c of B.C. land by 2030, it’s been just about enterprise as common the place the atmosphere is worried, with the emphasis, usually, on enterprise.

Article content material

Barring one mysterious exception: grizzly bears. Months in the past, the Surroundings Ministry started engaged on what it referred to as a “grizzly bear stewardship framework” whose objective was to enhance conservation efforts and fill “data gaps” the place grizzlies are involved. Why grizzlies and why now? Your guess is nearly as good as mine, however at first look it sounded constructive.

Article content material

Granted, it’s not as if grizzlies are the one wild creature in B.C. underneath risk of … properly, modernity, however they’re a keystone species, that means in the event that they’re in hassle, a whole lot of lesser animals are, too.

Central to this effort was an in depth questionnaire that anybody was allowed to reply, but it surely’s a reasonably protected wager that solely individuals with a selected curiosity in grizzlies — scientists, animal-welfare teams, hunters and information outfitters — did. As somebody who crammed within the questionnaire myself, it’s no exaggeration to say that to make sense of it, you needed to know your stuff and comprehend it properly. A lay individual would have been misplaced.

Which, I’ve to confess, solely added to my suspicions. Based on the ministry, its goals have been fourfold: 1) to teach the general public about grizzlies, 2) invite public suggestions on the framework, 3) determine deficiencies within the framework, and 4) gauge what actually issues to British Columbians in relation to grizzlies.

Once more, all that sounds good, however simply after the deadline for finishing the questionnaire handed, information emerged {that a} six-year examine of B.C.’s Elk Valley close to the Alberta and Montana borders confirmed it to have the very best mortality fee for younger grizzlies in North America. Street and railway deaths are accountable.

Article content material

Article content material

The examine’s chief, UBC scientist Clayton Lamb, defined: “If you dig into it, and form of perceive the inhabitants dynamics, you notice that it’s not likely working on this space for these bears.”

In different phrases, if the province was critical about bettering grizzly administration, wouldn’t Elk Valley be the perfect place to start?

Apparently not. No motion has been taken to deal with the scenario there. As an alternative all we now have is that this questionnaire whose very existence poses probably the most perplexing query of all: What’s it actually for? In a letter despatched to the federal government by 55 scientists and conservation teams in mid-October, their guess coincided with mine: a camouflaged return to searching.

For many of its 137-year historical past, colonial wildlife administration in B.C. has been left within the trigger-happy palms of hunters and people sympathetic to searching. Since they have been deemed to be specialists, it adopted that they need to run the present.

It wasn’t till environmentalists began poking their noses in locations they weren’t welcome that issues began to alter. The wildlife department workplace even suffered the indignity of being renamed the ecosystems department. That will need to have damage.

Article content material

However not as a lot because the NDP authorities’s 2017 ban on the trophy searching of grizzlies, in all probability probably the most public piece of environmental laws the social gathering has ever enacted.

Whereas it could have infuriated hunters, it delighted voters. Based on a September ballot accomplished by Analysis Co., a whopping 84 per cent of British Columbians oppose sport searching of grizzlies and 77 per cent need the ban made everlasting.

So why does this so-called framework go away the door ajar to its return?

It by no means comes proper out and says it want to convey searching again, however there are clues. For one, whereas the questionnaire does refer often to the potential for renewed searching in some areas, it by no means speaks of a everlasting ban.

It beggars perception {that a} authorities would ever take into account undoing a regulation as common as B.C.’s ban on grizzly searching. However that reputation begs a confounding riddle: why isn’t the ban everlasting? Seventy-seven per cent of British Columbians nearly by no means agree on something, however they agree on that.

Nicholas Learn is the writer of 13 books on animals and nature and a former Vancouver Solar reporter.

Article content material

Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the information you could know — add VancouverSun.com and TheProvince.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.

You may as well assist our journalism by turning into a digital subscriber: For simply $14 a month, you may get limitless, ad-lite entry to The Vancouver Solar, The Province, Nationwide Publish and 13 different Canadian information websites. Help us by subscribing at present: The Vancouver Solar | The Province.

Article content material