Europe’s 340 million pets are unlikely to swing this yr’s European elections, although with cats, one can by no means make sure. Jennifer Baker seems at Europe’s animal-related coverage dynamics and the way they may affect June’s electoral combine.
2024 is a bumper yr for elections across the globe. In Europe, the price of residing, power, setting, and migration are among the many prime issues of voters at a nationwide degree. With the European Parliament, voting intentions is usually a little completely different, permitting for broader areas of concern the place native party-political questions are usually much less dominant. This implies points similar to animal welfare can come to the fore.
In accordance with the European Pet Meals Trade Federation (FEDIAF), European households boasted 340 million pets in 2022 – together with 127 million cats and 104 million canine – throughout greater than 90 million properties, so it will appear we’re a continent of animal lovers, and but animal welfare just isn’t a difficulty that’s routinely seen as a vote winner in nationwide politics.
Dr Joanna Swabe, senior director of public affairs for Humane Society Worldwide/Europe, defined: “Animal welfare is a kind of uncommon points that’s neither left nor proper. Throughout the political spectrum and regardless of nationality, you’ll all the time discover politicians who care in regards to the plight of animals. It’s definitely not the unique area of the Greens and the Left.”
Swade remarked that through the years she’s even encountered very conservative right-wing MEPs for whom animal welfare is paramount.
Within the European Parliament, the Intergroup on the Welfare and Conservation of Animals brings collectively greater than 90 MEPs to work collectively to advance animal welfare and conservation in EU coverage making.
Current points underneath dialogue embody a proposal for a regulation on the welfare of canine and cats and their traceability, safety of wolves within the EU, the usage of animals in science and a brand new proposal for a regulation on the safety of animals throughout transport.
The intergroup additionally advocates for Cage-Free Farming and a Fur-Free Europe, whereas highlighting the significance of Animal Welfare Labelling.
Catalysts for change
“MEPs can function catalysts to push for higher animal welfare laws,” defined Danish S&D MEP, Niels Fuglsang.
Fuglsang is one among many European Parliament candidates within the upcoming elections to have signed the Eurogroup for Animals’ “Vote for Animals” pledge: a dedication to push the European Fee to place ahead bold laws in areas crucial to animal welfare.
A few of the legislative proposals are apparent, similar to fur labelling within the revision of EU textiles Regulation. Others are extra oblique. For instance, the European Inexperienced Deal units out the ambition to succeed in zero air pollution for a toxic-free setting. The so-called REACH revision might be a chance to advertise non-animal testing.
Landmark alternative
And it’s not solely animals’ rights teams that assist higher authorized safety for our furry pals. Cefic, the voice of the chemical trade in Europe, described the REACH revision as a “landmark alternative to speed up growth, validation and regulatory acceptance of human-relevant, animal-free approaches to evaluate security of chemical compounds.”
“By making each effort to establish the place animal-based testing can reliably get replaced by non-animal methodologies and mirror newest advances in science, we’ll create a triple win for the trade, regulators, and animal welfare. This requires a paradigm shift in security evaluation in direction of Subsequent Technology security evaluation, just like strikes seen within the space of cosmetics or prescribed drugs,” mentioned the organisation.
The EU Pharmaceutical Package deal at the moment underneath co-decision might additionally encourage new applied sciences to cut back testing on dwell animals.
One nationwide outlier the place animal – particularly fowl – welfare and security is a sizzling button challenge is Malta. Over the past European elections in 2019, Malta’s highly effective pro-hunting foyer, FKNK, urged its supporters to not abstain, however to vote for its most well-liked candidates.
Can not ignore agriculture
In Malta it’s the searching foyer that pressures political events. Elsewhere in Europe the influential farming foyer holds sway. The protests of latest weeks have proven candidates that they can’t afford to disregard the agricultural, agricultural vote.
The Humane Society Worldwide/Europe’s manifesto, which goals to encourage policymakers to take a extra moral stance on animal welfare, has livestock prime of its agenda.
Swabe identified that many politicians are pleased to loudly trumpet their assist for legislative motion to finish the unlawful pet commerce however are conspicuously quiet in terms of pigs and poultry saved on Europe’s farms.
“We’re informed the Fee is at the moment assessing whether or not the transition to cage-free farming is sustainable for the agricultural sector and that additional consultations on, amongst different issues, the prices and size of transition durations are wanted,” mentioned Swabe.
She added that for the thousands and thousands of laying hens nonetheless confined to enriched battery cages, and thousands and thousands of pigs who proceed to languish in particular person sow stalls for a major proportion of their gestation, “ […] what is really unsustainable is that this failure to take decisive motion to supply them with housing programs that meet their welfare wants.”
[By Jennifer Baker I Edited by Brian Maguire | Euractiv’s Advocacy Lab ]
Learn extra with Euractiv