New anti-replacement-worker laws is ’a begin,’ says union

Article content material

Final week, the federal authorities launched a brand new piece of laws that may ban employers at federally regulated workplaces from bringing in substitute staff to proceed operations usually finished by unionized workers throughout strikes and lockouts. Whereas the transfer has been known as “a great first step,” federal union heads say extra must be finished to enhance and lengthen the attain of the invoice to incorporate the general public sector.

Article content material

Launched by Canada’s labour minister Seamus O’Regan, Invoice C-58 outlined a wonderful of as much as $100,000 per day for corporations who select to violate the principles.

Article content material

It additionally included exceptions, together with for in conditions the place changing staff can be vital to stop threats to well being and security or would stop severe property or environmental harm.

The invoice would have an effect on about 1,000,000 workers and apply to federally regulated industries, like banking, airports and most Crown companies.

It might not apply to provincially or territorially regulated workers or to the federal public service, which is roofed by the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act, a separate piece of laws.

If the laws passes, it is going to come into power 18 months after it receives Royal Assent.

The Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) mentioned in an announcement that it “welcomes the tabling of long-awaited anti-scab laws,” noting that “whereas this laws is a begin, it’s not good.”

Chris Aylward, Nationwide President of the Public Service Alliance of Canada. “Using substitute staff drags out labour disputes and divides communities by pitting staff in opposition to one another,” PSAC’s nationwide president Chris Aylward mentioned within the assertion. “Free and honest collective bargaining – with out the specter of substitute staff taking their jobs – is one of the best ways to succeed in honest agreements and steady workplaces.”

Article content material

PSAC – which has known as for related provisions to be prolonged to all staff within the federal public sector – mentioned it expects to work with the federal government to strengthen the laws, including that it has “important issues” concerning the exceptions outlined within the invoice, the 18-month delay anticipated earlier than the laws comes into power and the requirement for the Canada Industrial Relations Board to rule on each strike motion.

Invoice C-58 detailed language requiring each events to agree inside 15 days after a discover for collective bargaining which providers they think about essential to proceed within the occasion of a strike or lockout. The invoice contains that if events can’t resolve, the Canada Industrial Relations Board must make the choice.

Jennifer Carr, president of the Skilled Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) mentioned she finds the invoice to be hypocritical.

“The federal government likes to make laws for the federally regulated sectors that don’t apply to themselves,” Carr mentioned, noting that equally, the federal government’s new invoice on synthetic intelligence doesn’t apply to federal authorities operations. “I believe that if you wish to have an equal enjoying subject and never be topic to politics, the identical type of guidelines ought to apply to all people.”

Article content material

Carr mentioned anti-replacement employee laws is “actually vital for all staff,” including that the union plans to participate within the session course of.

“If staff are going to be with out pay and withdrawing their labour, employers shouldn’t be capable to simply exchange them, prolonging a strike unnecessarily,” Carr mentioned, including that legal guidelines banning substitute staff have existed in British Columbia because the Nineteen Nineties and in Quebec because the Nineteen Seventies. “I can take a parallel to the federal public service, after we come to the desk, we wish to have two prepared companions who wish to negotiate a greater contract.

“What produces delays and what frustrates workers, my union members, is when it takes so lengthy to barter a settlement. And more often than not, it’s as a result of there’s no impetus on the employer aspect to resolve the strike or resolve a labour difficulty.”

Like PSAC, Carr mentioned she has issues concerning the exclusions and the 18-month delay.

“For one thing that’s been on the radar for over two, three years now, I’m questioning why they want a lot time to enact such a useful piece of laws,” Carr mentioned.

Article content material

Trying forward, Aylward mentioned PSAC plans to push for the ban of substitute staff inside the public service as effectively.

“Adjustments to the Canada Labour Code are the primary optimistic step ahead, and we’ll be working to enhance lots of the gaps within the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act within the months forward, together with language round the usage of substitute staff and the way the federal government negotiates contracts with its staff,” Aylward mentioned.

With recordsdata from The Canadian Press. 

Our web site is your vacation spot for up-to-the-minute information, so be certain to bookmark our homepage and join our newsletters so we will hold you knowledgeable.

Article content material