A non-binding opinion of Polish advocate normal Maciej Szpunar to the Court docket of Justice of the EU revealed on Thursday (11 January) suggests reaffirming the nation of origin precept on joined instances of the short-term rental business.
Airbnb, Google Trip Leases, Amazon Companies and Expedia introduced actions in opposition to sure selections by the Italian regulatory authority AGCOM relating to the best way to enter a register, pay a monetary contribution and submit an data request that they thought-about have been inconsistent with EU competitors legislation.
They argued that these selections weren’t in keeping with the nation of origin precept, which permits an organization primarily based in an EU nation to supply its providers in every other member state primarily based on the laws of its house nation.
Of their view, the Italian guidelines on short-term rental letting infringed on their rights to honest competitors throughout the EU single market.
In accordance to Szpunar, “the Directive on digital commerce does preclude” the imposition of additional obligations on a web based service supplier established in one other EU member state.
If Szpunar’s opinion is adopted by the highest EU Court docket in its judgement, such a call would influence US firms with EU headquarters, similar to Eire-based Airbnb and Google, in addition to Luxembourg-based Amazon.
Nonetheless, it could not influence Expedia, which is solely established in america.
Airbnb welcomed the opinion of the advocate normal, whereas Amazon didn’t want to remark, and Google continues to be reviewing the opinion earlier than delivering a remark.
Expedia didn’t reply to Euractiv by the point of publication of the article.
Overlapping of Italian and EU legal guidelines
US firms particularly contemplate the Italian obligations as infringing the EU regulation on equity and transparency and opposite to the nation of origin precept set within the eCommerce directive.
Italy argued that the Italian legislation merely applied the EU regulation on equity and transparency.
The advocate normal sided with US firms in studying the nation of origin precept. Moreover, he defined that Italian legislation can’t be thought-about to implement EU laws.
An EU regulation is a binding legislative act that should be utilized in your entire EU. Opposite to directives, which should be transposed within the nationwide authorized framework, laws are instantly relevant within the nationwide jurisdictions of EU international locations and subsequently don’t want nationwide legal guidelines of implementation.
Szpunar’s opinion reads that “the target of that regulation is to contribute to the right functioning of the inner market”, subsequently “a member state can not acquire extra data than is related to its obligations beneath that regulation”.
The nation of origin precept has been set in EU legislation for the reason that 12 months 2000 and has been confirmed in legislation by means of a number of acts, similar to 2018’s Common Information Safety Regulation, or 2022’s Digital Companies Act.
The Court docket of Justice of the EU shall render a remaining choice within the coming months, probably following the opinion of the advocate normal, therefore releasing the US firms – besides Expedia – from the Italian monetary and administrative obligations.
[Edited by Luca Bertuzzi/Nathalie Weatherald]
Learn extra with Euractiv
