14.6 C
New York
söndag, oktober 20, 2024

EPA proposes payment geared toward decreasing methane emissions : NPR


A flare burns pure gasoline at an oil nicely on Aug. 26, 2021, in Watford Metropolis, N.D. Oil and pure gasoline corporations must pay a payment for methane emissions that exceed sure ranges beneath a brand new rule proposed by the Biden administration.

Matthew Brown/AP


disguise caption

toggle caption

Matthew Brown/AP


A flare burns pure gasoline at an oil nicely on Aug. 26, 2021, in Watford Metropolis, N.D. Oil and pure gasoline corporations must pay a payment for methane emissions that exceed sure ranges beneath a brand new rule proposed by the Biden administration.

Matthew Brown/AP

WASHINGTON — Oil and pure gasoline corporations for the primary time must pay a payment for methane emissions that exceed sure ranges beneath a rule proposed Friday by the Biden administration.

The proposed Environmental Safety Company rule follows by on a directive from Congress included within the 2022 local weather legislation. The brand new payment is meant to encourage business to undertake greatest practices that scale back emissions of methane and thereby keep away from paying.

Methane is a local weather ”tremendous pollutant” that’s stronger within the quick time period than carbon dioxide and is accountable for about one-third of greenhouse gasoline emissions. The oil and pure gasoline sector is the biggest industrial supply of methane emissions in america, and advocates say discount of methane emissions is a vital strategy to sluggish local weather change.

Extra methane produced this yr would end in a payment of $900 per ton, with charges rising to $1,500 per ton by 2026.

EPA Administrator Michael Regan mentioned the proposed payment would work in tandem with a remaining rule on methane emissions EPA introduced final month. The payment, formally generally known as the Methane Emissions Discount Program, will encourage early deployment of accessible applied sciences to scale back methane emissions and different dangerous air pollution earlier than the brand new requirements take impact, he mentioned.

The rule introduced in December features a two-year phase-in interval for corporations to remove routine flaring of pure gasoline from new oil wells.

”EPA is delivering on a complete technique to scale back wasteful methane emissions that endanger communities and gasoline the local weather disaster,” Regan mentioned in a press release. When finalized later this yr, the proposed methane payment will set expertise requirements that can ”incentivize business innovation” and spur motion to scale back air pollution, he mentioned.

Main oil and gasoline corporations already meet or exceed efficiency ranges set by Congress beneath the local weather legislation, which means they won’t must pay the proposed payment, Regan and different officers mentioned.

Sen. Tom Carper, chairman of the Senate Surroundings and Public Works Committee, mentioned he was happy the administration was transferring ahead with the methane payment as directed by Congress.

”We all know methane is over 80 instances stronger than carbon dioxide at trapping warmth in our ambiance within the quick time period,” mentioned Carper, D-Del. He mentioned this system ”will incentivize producers to chop wasteful and extreme methane emissions throughout oil and gasoline manufacturing.”

New Jersey Rep. Frank Pallone, the highest Democrat on the Home Power and Commerce Committee, mentioned oil and gasoline corporations have lengthy calculated that it is cheaper to waste methane by flaring and different strategies than to make vital upgrades to forestall leaks.

”Wasted methane by no means makes its strategy to customers, however they’re nonetheless caught with the invoice,” Pallone mentioned. The proposed methane payment ”will guarantee customers not pay for wasted vitality or the hurt its emissions could cause.”

Republicans name the methane payment a tax that would elevate the value of pure gasoline. ”This proposal means elevated prices for employers and better vitality payments for hundreds of thousands of Individuals,” mentioned Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-West Virginia.

Trade group calls the rule a ”punitive tax enhance”

The American Petroleum Institute, the oil and gasoline business’s largest lobbying group, slammed the proposal Friday and known as for Congress to repeal it.

”Because the world seems to be to U.S. vitality producers to offer stability in an more and more unstable world, this punitive tax enhance is a critical misstep that undermines America’s vitality benefit,” mentioned Dustin Meyer, API’s senior vice chairman of coverage, economics and regulatory affairs.

Whereas the group helps ”good” federal methane regulation, the EPA proposal ”creates an incoherent, complicated regulatory regime that can solely stifle innovation and undermine our potential to fulfill rising vitality demand,” Meyer mentioned. ”We look ahead to working with Congress to repeal the IRA’s misguided new tax on American vitality.”

Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Protection Fund, known as the proposed payment ”widespread sense,” including that oil and gasoline corporations needs to be held accountable for methane air pollution, a major supply of world warming.

In a associated growth, EPA mentioned it’s working with business and others to enhance how methane emissions are reported, citing quite a few research displaying that and oil and gasoline corporations have considerably underreported their methane emissions to the EPA beneath the company’s Greenhouse Fuel Reporting Program.

The local weather legislation, formally generally known as the Inflation Discount Act, established a waste-emissions cost for methane from oil and gasoline amenities that report emissions of greater than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equal per yr to the EPA. The proposal introduced Friday units out particulars of how the payment can be applied, together with how exemptions can be utilized.

The company mentioned it expects that over time, fewer oil and gasoline websites can be charged as they scale back their emissions in compliance with the rule.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles