The previous metropolis government committee chairperson is looking for $1.6 million for reviews she says include ”a number of factual errors and omissions.”
Article content material
Dominique Ollivier, former government committee chairperson below Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante, is suing Québecor media.
She is looking for $1.6 million in compensation from two of the corporate’s information businesses, TVA and QMI, for reviews containing “a number of factual errors and omissions.”
Article content material
Her declare consists of about $600,000 in misplaced wage, $500,000 in ethical damages and $500,000 in exemplary damages.
Commercial 2
Article content material
A collection of tales by Québecor shops Journal de Montréal and TVA within the fall criticized journey and meal bills incurred by the management of the Workplace de la session publique de Montréal. Ollivier was president of the group from 2014 to 2021.
The reviews discovered she expensed $17,793 in restaurant payments between 2016 and 2019, together with a much-discussed $347 oyster dinner for 2 individuals in a Parisian restaurant.
Because of the controversy over the reviews, Ollivier resigned from her position as government committee president — two years after turning into the primary Black individual named to the place. Nevertheless, she stayed on as metropolis councillor for Rosemont—La Petite–Patrie.
“That is going to sound boastful, (however I’m staying) as a result of … I do know I didn’t do something unsuitable,” she instructed the Gazette’s Nook Sales space, in a taped interview in November, including she had no regrets about her actions. I used to be being lambasted “for doing what? Having one oyster dinner eight years in the past in one other job? Which I’ve repaid?”
In a press release Friday, Ollivier stated: “I consider in investigative journalism and I absolutely acknowledge the correct of journalists to research and ask questions on subjects of public curiosity. That stated, journalists even have the obligation to truthfully inform the general public, with out duping public opinion utilizing amalgams or truncated info.”
Headline Information
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Ollivier went on to say regardless of her collaboration, “the journalists relied on info that was deformed or offered out of context and typically false. They omitted necessary info that was at their disposal and will have higher knowledgeable a few of their conclusions.”
“They voluntarily maintained confusion concerning the info and temporality, utilizing unproven insinuations and resorting to clumsy comparisons to sensationalistic ends, in addition to practices that contravene the code of ethics of their occupation,” she stated.
Ollivier says she filed a criticism to that impact with the Conseil de Presse du Québec on Dec. 3, which the group acknowledged receipt of on Dec. 14, however defined the delay for such recordsdata is between six to fifteen months. That’s too lengthy for her to attend, Ollivier famous, because the legislation permits a restrict of three months after a publication to be able to protect a plaintiff’s rights earlier than the courtroom in such instances.
The way in which by which the articles have been picked up, shared and analyzed by different publications had an unlimited impact on her, Ollivier stated, due to “false, truncated or amalgamated info that didn’t permit the general public or decision-makers to kind a transparent thought of the state of affairs.”
“In a world the place disinformation and the manipulation of public opinion are rampant, we’ve to have the ability to depend on rigorous media that public opinion can belief. That’s why I took this chance to ask the courts to look at my case and weigh in on this necessary query,” Ollivier concluded.
Advisable from Editorial
Commercial 4
Article content material
Article content material