COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — International Points

By Admin

november 1, 2023

0

18

by Anup Shah
This web page Created Saturday, January 24, 2015

This web page: https://www.globalissues.org/article/805/cop20-lima-climate-conference.
To print all data (e.g. expanded aspect notes, exhibits various hyperlinks), use the print model:

On this web page:

Introduction
Assembly consequence
Mainstream media reporting
In context: widespread however differentiated duties
Extra data
Information tales from IPS

Introduction

December 1 – 14, 2014, Lima, Peru was the venue for the twentieth annual United Nations Local weather Change Convention, often known as the twentieth Convention of the Events — or COP 20.

The aim of this convention was to create a common settlement on local weather change motion and start the method of financing mitigation.

Again to high

Assembly consequence

The assembly ended with all nations agreeing to chop again greenhouse fuel emissions. Often known as the Lima Accord, this treaty shouldn’t be legally binding and nations shouldn’t have to specify how a lot they are going to in the reduction of, as an alternative agreeing to report their plans again by March 2015.

Whereas for a lot of it appeared like a profitable consequence, others have been dissatisfied, comparable to poor nations struggling to rebuild from present impacts of local weather change who have been alarmed on the disappearance of loss and harm commitments from the ultimate textual content which has been a part of the dialogue for years.

The worldwide local weather motion, 350.org, summarized the disappointments and hopeful points of the assembly consequence, noting

The brand new settlement doesn’t replicate the urgency of the local weather disaster
Some good agreements – however no measures to make sure implementation
Least developed and weak nations overlooked within the chilly
Divestment (from fossil gas reliance) is extra essential than ever
International momentum for actual options is stronger than ever and can carry on going.

In making an attempt to place a optimistic spin on the general disappointment they felt, they concluded, Ultimately, a world local weather treaty is only one device to fight local weather change. Actual change goes to proceed to come back from the grassroots. The UN Local weather Talks proceed to be a spot the place the world’s nations comes collectively to debate this disaster and persons are placing in monumental efforts to verify Paris [the next global meeting] received’t be like Copenhagen which was filled with disappointments regardless of large guarantees.

Samantha Smith, Chief of WWF’s International Local weather and Vitality Initiative, was fairly scathing of the assembly consequence saying that political expediency received over scientific urgency. She additionally famous that Developed nation governments couldn’t even handle to clarify how they are going to ship the long-promised US$100 billion per yr in local weather finance by 2020. In a transfer that seemingly dismissed the plight of probably the most weak nations, they fully eliminated any significant language about ‘loss and harm’.

Again to high

Mainstream media reporting

As with virtually each earlier assembly (with occasional exceptions), mainstream media reporting was very poor given the significance of this international difficulty. The place the assembly was reported it was typically in direction of the tip, and simply sound chew kind summaries saying all nations agreed to emission cuts and that this was a significant enchancment.

Whereas the treaty continued to say it honors the long-standing widespread however differentiated duties the mainstream media reporting (as in most years) has sometimes failed to supply rationalization and context of this precept that has been an essential a part of these talks for over 2 many years; that poor and creating nations shouldn’t bear the identical duties because the developed ones (as a result of they don’t seem to be the reason for the anthropogenic carbon emissions over the earlier many years which have led to this, which is detailed rather more on this website’s web page on local weather justice).

A touch in direction of this precept could have been introduced as a viewpoint of China or India, given the impression they’re being obstacles, slightly then explaining this precept in additional context.

That was simply one of many points skirted over or omitted from widespread reporting. Others included points on financing, know-how help for poorer nations, and many others. Behind the scenes, for many years, wealthy nations have stalled on these items or actively prevented making an attempt to share know-how and many others, which is barely reported.

Yearly, this criticism is product of mainstream reporting, so with out following these negotiations every year, it may be simple to come back away with the impression that this assembly had a optimistic consequence.

However as this dialogue hosted by Democracy Now! exhibits, there have been a lot of essential problems with competition:

Emissions-Reducing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014.

Again to high

In context: widespread however differentiated duties

A few years in the past all nations agreed that local weather change was largely the results of actions from at this time’s industrialized nations, as carbon dioxide — the principle greenhouse fuel — stays within the environment for many years. But, the poorest would find yourself struggling probably the most for an issue they largely didn’t trigger. The approaches to mitigation (emissions discount) would subsequently be completely different for these teams of nations — the widespread however differentiated duties precept.

It’s on this context that the dialogue for loss and harm has come about. And it’s one thing that wealthy nations are eager to do away with .

The years of resistance on this difficulty (and lots of others) means every time it’s mentioned once more the reactions appear to get much more hostile. Mixed with the dearth of detailed context within the mainstream media protection of this side, it then turns into simpler every time to see culprits as China and India given their monumental greenhouse emissions in recent times, in comparison with the far larger quantity by the industrialized nations over the longer interval. See this website’s part on local weather justice for extra detailed background.

And as this website has mentioned for years on the local weather justice web page, the wealthy nations are delaying any significant motion till it’s ultimately — and disproportionately — paid for the by the creating nations. New Delhi based mostly Nitin Sethi, affiliate editor at Enterprise Normal, interviewed within the earlier talked about video says the identical factor, however extra frankly:

There isn’t any motion that’s going to occur between now and 2020. All of that was to be accomplished by the developed nations. They [rich nations] mainly have simply mentioned at Lima that we aren’t going to do any greater than what we’re doing to date, and the burden can shift onto the post-2020 period, the place different creating nations must share it. So, to me, it signifies actually negotiation in unhealthy religion.

Nitin Sethi, Emissions-Reducing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014

Again to high