Good morning. It’s Thursday, Feb. 22. Right here’s what it’s worthwhile to know to begin your day.
Did she commit homicide?
The high-profile trial of Rebecca Grossman within the 2020 collision that killed Mark and Jacob Iskander, 11 and eight, at a Westlake Village crosswalk, approaches its conclusion after closing arguments Wednesday.
Quickly, a jury will decide the Hidden Hills lady’s destiny as she faces two counts of second-degree homicide, two counts of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence, and one depend of hit-and-run driving leading to demise. If discovered responsible on all costs, she may face 34 years to life in jail.
Grossman, 60, was a outstanding determine in the local people. Alongside her husband, Dr. Peter Grossman, she based the Grossman Burn Basis.
Instances employees author Richard Winton has coated the six-week trial that has included unsettling particulars, emotional outbursts and witness testimony. Right here’s a recap of the case.
Grossman’s homicide cost
To safe a second-degree homicide conviction, prosecutors should show that Grossman acted with implied malice — understanding her actions could possibly be lethal however disregarding the danger.
She was not charged with driving underneath the affect. However prosecutors allege Grossman, 60, was impaired. They are saying she had cocktails with Scott Erickson, a former Dodgers pitcher, after which raced with him — he in his black Mercedes SUV and he or she in her white Mercedes SUV — alongside Triunfo Canyon Highway till they reached a crosswalk the place she fatally struck the Iskander brothers.
A breathalyzer check performed on the scene revealed Grossman’s blood-alcohol stage to be round 0.075%; a subsequent blood check performed three hours later confirmed the extent at 0.08%, California’s authorized restrict. Moreover, traces of Valium had been present in her system, two criminalists testified.
The decide denied her authorized workforce’s request to dismiss the homicide costs, ruling prosecutors had offered sufficient proof displaying voluntary intoxication and driving at a excessive pace.
Prosecutors stated in court docket she reached a pace of 81 mph earlier than frivolously braking, then slamming into the boys at 73 mph, sending one youngster flying into the air. After hanging the kids, she didn’t cease till security options on her automotive shut it down, in line with the prosecution.
A crash knowledgeable testified that Grossman may have prevented hitting the boys if she had been touring the posted restrict of 45 mph as a result of they already would have been on the curb.
Prosecutors highlighted Grossman’s consciousness of the lethal penalties of rushing, saying she was warned of the dangers when she was ticketed for going 92 mph on the 101 Freeway in 2013.
The protection’s argument
Grossman’s protection workforce argued that Erickson — not Grossman — was the primary to strike the boys. Crash reconstruction consultants for the protection have testified that Erickson’s black Mercedes SUV hit the boys first, sending Mark over his car and onto the hood of Grossman’s car.
Erickson confronted a misdemeanor depend of reckless driving in reference to the deadly crash. That was dismissed after he made a public service announcement concerning the significance of protected driving.
Throughout closing arguments Wednesday, protection attorneys continued to level the finger at Erickson. “If in case you have doubt that the black automotive hit a kind of kids, this case is over,” stated Grossman’s lead legal professional, Tony Buzbee.
Her legal professional offered witnesses who testified that she drove responsibly, wasn’t impaired and traveled at not more than 52 mph. The protection additionally contends that the collision occurred exterior the crosswalk.
Grossman knowledgeable the decide that she wouldn’t be testifying within the trial.
Alexis Grossman, her daughter, shared tearful testimony that bolstered the protection’s argument that Erickson was at fault.
After closing argument rebuttals, the case is predicted to go to the jury Thursday.
Homicide costs in automotive deaths are unusual
California prison legislation typically categorizes vehicular killings underneath manslaughter — “the illegal killing of a human being with out malice.”
A number of legislation consultants mentioned why vehicular homicide costs are a rarity with Important California’s Ryan Fonseca in November.
A number of notable situations of drivers going through homicide costs have made headlines not too long ago.
A nurse faces a number of homicide costs in a high-speed crash that killed 5 individuals two years in the past. Moreover, in October, a person was charged with 4 counts of homicide after his involvement in a high-speed crash that killed 4 Pepperdine college students alongside Pacific Coast Freeway.
The essential distinction between homicide and manslaughter lies within the prosecutor’s capacity to show intent. Homicide is described as a deliberate act, whereas manslaughter sometimes entails recklessness or negligence.
Prosecutors can cost somebody with homicide whether it is believed they acted with implied malice, similar to drunk driving, in line with the California Supreme Courtroom.
County prosecutors consider every incident “on a case-by-case foundation,” the district legal professional’s workplace stated, with figuring out elements together with:
- Velocity (and pace restrict)
- Driving sample
- Location of the incident (residential versus business, floor streets versus freeways, college zones)
- Driving underneath the affect
- Driving historical past
- Driver’s prior warning historical past
At this time’s prime tales
A view of Badwater Basin in Loss of life Valley Nationwide Park from July 2023 to February 2024. As of mid-February, the lake — dubbed Lake Manly — was 6 miles lengthy, 3 miles huge and as much as 2 ft deep in some locations.
(NASA Earth Observatory pictures by Wanmei Liang, utilizing Landsat information from the U.S. Geological Survey.)
Local weather and atmosphere
Crime and courts
Extra huge tales
Get limitless entry to the Los Angeles Instances. Subscribe right here.
At this time’s nice reads
(Photograph by Jeniffer Brown)
The brand new magnificence routine: Drop pounds with Ozempic, tighten up with beauty surgical procedure. Sufferers taking Ozempic and different fashionable injectables are going underneath the knife to right the negative effects of speedy weight reduction, which embody sagging pores and skin, hole cheeks and an aged look.
Different nice reads
How can we make this text extra helpful? Ship feedback to essentialcalifornia@latimes.com.
In your downtime
Reporter Deborah Vankin receives a Chinese language scalp remedy from Tou Dao Tang Head Spa in Temple Metropolis.
(Dania Maxwell / Los Angeles Instances)
Going out
Staying in
And eventually … from our archives
The U.S. hockey workforce pounces on goalie Jim Craig on Feb. 22, 1980, after a 4-3 victory towards the Soviet Union in a medal-round match on the 1980 Winter Olympics in Lake Placid, N.Y. America upset the mighty Soviets in a panoramic second weighted with the strain of the Chilly Conflict.
(Related Press)
On today 44 years in the past, the underdog U.S. hockey workforce defeated the four-time defending gold medal-winning Soviet workforce on the Winter Olympics in Lake Placid, N.Y.
For the fortieth anniversary of the historic win, The Instances’ Helene Elliott wrote about how the match nonetheless has quite a lot of that means to gamers and followers.
Have a terrific day, from the Important California workforce
Anthony De Leon, reporting fellow
Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editor
Stephanie Chavez, deputy metro editor
Test our prime tales, matters and the newest articles on latimes.com.