Julian Assange didn’t seem on the first day of the listening to in London interesting in opposition to his extradition to america, and who can blame him? The WikiLeaks founder has been in Belmarsh jail in South London for nearly 5 years now, virtually all of it beneath separation from different prisoners and far of it beneath 23-hour-a-day lockdown.
Belmarsh, and such attendant regimes, are designed for shorter-term prisoners, and for these accused of terrorism, the precise blowing up of issues and folks. The regime Assange is beneath has grow to be, with its lack of social contact and social life, and its spartan situations, a type of torture. Provided that half IV of the “Cablegate” archive was recordsdata on the Guantanamo regime and the completely sequestered detainees there, Assange’s present regime is much less grim irony than it’s payback by the Atlantic powers for that type of revelation.
Three years of a harsh regime is concerning the restrict that may break anybody. Primo Levi famous in If This Is a Man, that, within the German camps, even essentially the most resolute Communist or essentially the most affectless skilled felony got here aside psychologically after three years of the system.
I think if anybody can stand such a regime, it’s somebody like Assange, who’s presupposed to have learn The Gulag Archipelago whereas dwelling wild within the Dandenongs for a number of months within the early Nineties. However a lot of his sequestration — in an English nation home, within the Ecuadorian embassy — has allowed him to proceed the WikiLeaks undertaking. Belmarsh has imposed a desocialisation, an unbecoming, that’s object is deliberate, or at the least systemic: to deprive you of the very inside means to withstand what’s being accomplished to you.
So, as this night Australian time, we go into the second day of this two-day listening to to attraction Assange’s imminent extradition, it isn’t shocking that he’s suicidal, depressed and in poor bodily well being, a lot of the latter presumably an impact of the previous. Belmarsh is basically an importation of the US prison-torture system into the British course of, and if he’s extradited he might be plunged deeper into that, farther from household, attorneys, and supporters, going through years of ready earlier than a trial happens.
The farcical course of makes use of remand to keep away from any accusations of detention with out trial, and questions of habeas corpus (which Assange, as a non-US citizen/resident, has no recourse to in any case). It’s a measure of the diploma to which the US jail system is a calibrated type of torture that the US needed to promise not to use its commonplace procedures, with the intention to get round an earlier keep of extradition, which had been primarily based on the notion that the system could be causative of Assange’s suicide, ought to he be positioned in it.
The present listening to is his next-to-final probability to keep away from extradition, which might be very swift ought to it happen. It’s earlier than two Excessive Courtroom justices, and it seeks merely go away to attraction. It’s not the attraction itself. If the attraction go away is granted, then there might be many extra months concerned in a full attraction. If it isn’t, then UK processes are exhausted, and solely an emergency injunction by the European Courtroom of Human Rights, or, one presumes, a unilateral determination by the UK authorities to disclaim extradition, will stand in the way in which.
For that cause, Assange’s defence, on day one of many listening to, has swung round to the broadest phrases, arguing that Assange’s actions — publishing an unlimited cache of leaked paperwork, whereby he might have assisted the leaker to bypass some encryption passwords — quantity to respectable political exercise, not espionage. The US-UK extradition treaty excludes extradition for political exercise.
The second a part of that’s the argument that bypassing a password on paperwork {that a} leaker is dealing with quantities to not more than commonplace journalistic apply in buying materials. Printing out from a disc? Restoring broken recordsdata? Placing a leaker up in a lodge for a number of days? That is all merely what is finished by main information organisations. It’s all doubtlessly criminalised by the Assange case.
Because of this, it’s believed, the Obama administration stayed an investigation into prosecution, given the advance involvement of The Guardian, The New York Instances and others within the Cablegate releases. The Trump administration revived it. The Biden administration didn’t re-stay it.
This may occasionally recommend a divergence between Obama and Biden. Biden is to the left of Obama on home coverage, however to the best on overseas coverage. Obama, a half-African, Indonesia-raised Hawaiian, had a extra distanced view of America’s claims to advantage than mainstream Democrats. Biden described Assange as a “high-tech terrorist” on the time of the Cablegate launch. Biden is sufficient of a “new frontier” man to consider that you simply simply don’t goddamn try this to the US. If the Division of Justice is driving the case autonomously, then on the very least, Biden’s refusal to remain it’s indicative of political disposition.
In the meantime, Assange and his staff have suffered from half-hearted help from those that ought to have been in his nook. Each The Guardian and The NY Instances betrayed, each via the malice and incompetence of some editors and journalists at these publications. They need to have had full entrance web page/dwelling display screen “clear the decks” coordinated headlines: “Free Julian Assange”.
The Australian authorities’s belated willingness to signal on to a movement calling for prosecution to be discontinued can also be too little, too late — and the truth that a right-dominated national-security Labor authorities agreed to it’s only as a result of they don’t consider it should make any distinction. Any Australian authorities that needed to actually make some distinction would have linked Assange’s destiny to intelligence sharing and Pine Hole. There’s clearly no probability of that occuring.
WikiLeaks’ first era — some early associates of Assange’s internationally — bailed out when the “collateral homicide” video and Cablegate releases had been first mooted, judging that the US would crunch them like a bug. So it has proved. WikiLeaks did precisely what it got down to do: change the entire concept of what respectable authorities secrecy was, and — with successors like Edward Snowden — make seen the intelligence companies’ political dominance of the West.
To name the US’ willpower to get him a backhanded praise is a sicker joke than I actually have the temper to make in the meanwhile. What an excellent earlier iteration of resistance — the cypherpunks record, of which Assange was a member — noticed as coming into being is now right here. Complete surveillance, but in addition more and more capricious repression of free exercise inside it, such because the Albanese authorities’s proposed ban on investigations, beneath the guise of banning doxxing. One may quote half a dozen different related legal guidelines, right here or within the works.
Tomorrow, the US Justice Division presents its case, and there may be presumably some transient rebuttal allowed. Then, in true British trend, it may very well be hours or months earlier than a call is made. All we are able to do now’s hold the problem seen and push for these in energy to take higher opposition to this iniquitous assault on journalism, free speech, inquiry and investigations, for so long as we’ve any left, whereas these, and Assange, are nonetheless with us.
How do you’re feeling about our authorities’s therapy of Assange? Tell us your ideas by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please embody your full identify to be thought of for publication. We reserve the best to edit for size and readability.