Brad Banducci has this morning stepped down as Woolworths CEO following a heated alternate with an ABC journalist who refused to exclude feedback that Banducci made on the report in an investigation into the grocery store big’s pricing practices.
The phrase “off/on the report” is such a well known piece of journalism jargon that almost all punters (or expensive readers, in your case) understand it.
On the threat of navel-gazing, many a journalist may have an anecdote from being at a cocktail party, divulging what they do for a dwelling, and being playfully requested to not report on the scandalous hijinks of Karen from accounts at Nameless Megacorp Inc.
Certainly, ABC’s 4 Corners this week highlighted the chasm between how most people understands “the report” to work, and the way the media does.
In an interview with ABC journalist Angus Grigg, the then Woolworths CEO Banducci referred to former ACCC chair Rod Sims as “retired”, an obvious shot at Sims’ {qualifications} to comment on Woolworths’ actions regarding competitors legislation. Banducci’s instant remorse turned to anger after his subsequent request to have the comment edited out was denied by a resolute Grigg, who insisted that it was “on the report”.
“You mentioned it, let’s simply transfer on,” mentioned Grigg. Banducci protested about good religion and walked out on the interview, earlier than being persuaded to return by Woolworths’ PR workers.
Banducci retired on Wednesday morning, simply two days after the interview aired. The announcement got here that Banducci would go away the corporate in September, to get replaced by WooliesX digital head Amanda Bardwell, because the grocery store big introduced its newest revenue outcomes, 2.5% rise in half-year revenue to $929 million (excluding one-off writedowns within the worth of its New Zealand, alcohol and resorts operations).
The thought of what “on the report” means is nebulous, and in lots of situations can imply various things to totally different journalists. The Media, Leisure and Arts Alliance is the height union physique for journalists, and its code of ethics states that journalists ought to “purpose to attribute data to its supply”.
“The place a supply seeks anonymity, don’t agree with out first contemplating the supply’s motives and any various attributable supply,” the code states. “The place confidences are accepted, respect them in all circumstances.”
Affiliate Professor Johan Lidberg, the top of journalism at Monash College’s faculty of media, movie and journalism, says the thought of what the report is means various things to totally different individuals as a result of “there are not any laborious and quick guidelines”.
Lidberg informed Crikey that as a “default level”, reporters ought to purpose for the whole lot to be on the report, and the place a supply requests in any other case, it must be agreed to prematurely and never with out consideration of the supply’s motives.
Lidberg mentioned Banducci’s behaviour within the 4 Corners interview was “amateurish and unprofessional”.
“[Angus Grigg] was completely proper — it’s an on-the-record, recorded interview,” he mentioned. “The CEO has no proper or scope to ask for issues to be taken out.”
The query of what the report is, and when journalists can go off the report, can also be raised usually within the political sphere, with the follow of “backgrounding”.
Sources giving data “on background”, whereas not restricted to politics, is frequent with media advisers who aren’t essentially authorised to behave as spokespeople on a problem however who’re tasked with expediently getting tales into the general public report, in accordance with Alexandra Wake, affiliate professor at RMIT’s faculty of media and communication.
Wake mentioned these guidelines of engagement are well-known within the political world.
“Working within the political sphere, it’s a must to take background data from a variety of politicians, advisors and departmental officers, and so they’ll by no means put their title to something. Everybody in that realm is aware of that,” Wake informed Crikey.
This concern got here to the fore in 2007 when former treasurer Peter Costello accused three journalists of breaching an understanding that feedback made at a 2005 dinner have been off the report.
Tony Wright, Michael Brissenden and Paul Daley have been allegedly informed over dinner that Costello threatened to “destroy” then prime minister John Howard’s management forward of the 2007 election to launch his personal management problem.
Retroactively, Wright informed ABC Radio two and a half years later that he regretted not writing the story on the time, however that ultimately publishing was “merely placing on the report what [Costello] says he by no means mentioned”.
Wake says the principles of engagement change in situations corresponding to these, and that in her view, if a supply have been to lie about an off-record dialog, “all bets are off”.
“If somebody goes out and lies about [the contents of an off-record conversation] later, I feel that does change the principles of engagement,” she mentioned.
Wake mentioned the 4 Corners episode demonstrated an rising “lack of expertise by PR individuals, media individuals and advertising individuals of the function and worth and significance of journalism.”
“The CEO clearly wanted higher media preparation. That was a failure of his PR staff, moderately than the journalist.
“[This incident is] one good motive why PR individuals ought to study journalism. Simply since you mentioned one thing you don’t like, doesn’t imply you get to take it again.”
What are your ideas on Banducci’s resignation? Tell us by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please embrace your full title to be thought-about for publication. We reserve the appropriate to edit for size and readability.