Padolsky: The place ought to Canada’s future inhabitants stay?

Article content material

On June 16, 2023, Canada’s inhabitants reached 40 million, an historic milestone for the nation. Sixteen weeks later, on Oct. 1, Statistics Canada dutifully reported that our inhabitants had elevated one more 528,396, a shocking spike.

This exponential surge has triggered a fierce debate over Canada’s already acute nationwide housing scarcity. A nationwide housing disaster has been declared. The housing provide hole has been quantified by Canada’s housing company (CMHC). We’d like an extra 3.5 million residential items by 2030.

Article content material

Article content material

Remarkably, our nationwide, provincial and municipal authorities have seemingly agreed on methods to deal with our quick housing trauma, however what’s our technique for accommodating the flood of future arrivals that can improve Canada’s inhabitants by at the very least one other 16 million by 2068 (or 34 million on the present charge)?

The query of how we home our rising inhabitants begs a associated however unasked query. Since 81.75 per cent of Canadians are urbanites, what’s our general nationwide technique for the place our rising inhabitants ought to stay?

We dwell in our cities in addition to our dwellings. Which cities will likely be residence to our subsequent 16 million Canadians after we have a good time Canada’s Bicentennial in 2067? We could take a laissez-faire method? We could depend on the diktats of our provincial governments (who would possibly fill our greenbelts with properties) or our municipalities (who’re scuffling with parochial short-term native points)? This macro-demographic and geographic problem wants to incorporate a nationwide perspective to forge a Pan-Canadian city technique. Why don’t now we have one?

Article content material

In 1971, the federal authorities, led by then-prime minister Pierre Trudeau, created a revolutionary and impressive Ministry of State for City Affairs (MSUA). Following 26 years of explosive post-war demographic and concrete progress, when Canada had solely 22 million individuals, it had turn into evident {that a} nationwide city technique was wanted to deal with the way forward for our city settlements strung out alongside the size of the U.S.-Canada border — a welcome nationwide awakening.

So what occurred? In 1979, the modern MSUA was out of the blue euthanized. Why? 1): It challenged the jealously guarded provincial jurisdiction over municipalities granted by the Canadian Structure. 2): It threatened the federal authorities’s established departments, which feared the lack of authority to a brand new entity. 3): City points have been overtaken by different political urgencies resembling inflation and the 1970’s oil disaster. The chance for a nationwide coverage on the way forward for Canada’s cities was thrown below a bus.

Is now the time to re-examine the way forward for city Canada by way of a nationwide lens? Sure, and right here’s why.

Article content material

Half of Canada’s inhabitants (20 million) at the moment lives and works within the Quebec Metropolis-Windsor hall, a densely urbanized ribbon whose geographic space compares with Nice Britain.11 The Federal authorities, after many years of procrastination, has lastly dedicated to realizing a high-frequency rail venture for this hall, linking Quebec, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto and 15 of Canada’s airports. However the place is our transit-oriented urbanization technique?

Ought to the hall’s share of future inhabitants progress (eight million by 2068) proceed to be absorbed primarily within the auto-dependent suburbs of our present cities? Or ought to a few of it’s directed to clusters of recent cities alongside this deliberate ribbon of metal? Or ought to Canada’s inhabitants progress be inspired elsewhere, say within the Maritimes, the Pacific coast and prairie provinces?

And what in regards to the North? With local weather change, is Richard Rohmer’s 1960’s resource-rich Mid-Canada Hall settlement technique value re-examining? The necessity for a contemporary Pan-Canadian evaluation and imaginative and prescient for the way forward for our Canadian cities as a community is lengthy overdue.

Article content material

Which city progress situations will extra successfully advance Canada’s net-zero greenhouse fuel emissions dedication by 2050? Which progress situations will respect the capability of present cities with out degrading — and even improve — their livability? Which progress situations will result in extra inexpensive and compassionate cities? Is freezing inhabitants progress an possibility?

The end result of this evaluation ought to result in a nationwide city technique that promotes the sustainability and livability of Canada’s future cities — and our planet. Let’s suppose Civitas, not Urbs.

Barry Padolsky is an Ottawa architect, city designer and heritage guide.

Article content material