Steven Galloway can go forward with a lawsuit in opposition to an ex-student and others for allegedly ruining his repute and profession by tweeting and posting he had assaulted and sexually assaulted a pupil who cannot be named.
Article content material
Author and former College of B.C. professor Steven Galloway, who was fired amid allegations he sexually and bodily assaulted a pupil, has received and partially received a collection of appeals launched by these he’s suing for defamation.
The B.C. Court docket of Enchantment on Wednesday launched its pretrial ruling on a lot of appeals and cross appeals ensuing from a 2021 pretrial judgment in a decrease court docket. It permits Galloway to go forward with a lawsuit suing his alleged sufferer and different defendants wherein he maintains they defamed him on social media and ruined his repute and profession.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Article content material
The explanations for judgment, signed by all three attraction judges, Justice Elizabeth Bennett, Justice Anne MacKenzie and Justice Peter Voith, dismissed the appeals of the alleged sufferer, who can solely be recognized as A.B. due to a publication ban, and 7 others who labored at UBC.
Galloway had additionally appealed or cross-appealed components of the 2021 judgment and was profitable in interesting some elements in 5 out of eight components. That included the Enchantment Court docket reversing a choice by the Supreme Court docket that dominated feedback A.B. made in 2015, when she “verbally revealed defamatory statements” to different defendants, had been dismissed from the lawsuit as a result of an excessive amount of time had handed when she made the feedback and the submitting of Galloway’s swimsuit.
In a press release launched on Wednesday by his lawyer, Galloway stated: “I’m relieved and grateful that this matter might be shifting to trial … The allegations made in opposition to me, and repeated as fact by the defendants on this case, are false.”
A.B.’s lawyer, David Wotherspoon, in an e mail known as the judgment “unlucky.”
It “leaves us extraordinarily involved in regards to the influence on survivors of sexual violence and particularly for college students, workers and school of universities and faculties who could really feel much less secure about coming ahead with issues,” he stated.
Dawn
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
He stated he hasn’t learn the judgment by and can determine on subsequent steps after talking with A.B.
The defendants utilized to have the lawsuit dismissed underneath the Safety of Public Participation Act (PPPA), aimed toward defending individuals from fits introduced merely to silence or punish a critic and known as anti-SLAPP, or strategic lawsuits in opposition to public participation, legal guidelines.
Galloway’s lawyer, Dan Burnett, stated in an e mail that within the judgment the Enchantment Court docket “laments that anti-SLAPP legal guidelines have been used to have interaction in protracted and costly functions, opposite to the aspirations behind the laws, which is to keep away from delay and expense. The motion was filed over 5 years in the past and has been held up far too lengthy on this anti-SLAPP course of.”
Because the decrease court docket justice did, the Enchantment Court docket justices emphasised that “this court docket will not be prejudging the final word deserves of Mr. Galloway’s declare or the defences which were raised” as that might be decided at trial.
The attraction judgment was to find out with out doing a “deep dive” in proof whether or not the defendants’ feedback might be thought of to be within the “robust public curiosity” and due to this fact allowed underneath the PPPA.
Commercial 4
Article content material
Galloway, who’s in his mid-40s, was faraway from his place as a tenured professor and the chair of the artistic writing program at UBC in 2015 after what had been publicly described as “severe allegations” had been levelled in opposition to him.
A report by a retired choose concluded Galloway had had a consensual affair with A.B., however Galloway was fired in 2016 because of an “irreparable breach of belief.”
Galloway says that since then he has not had any additional books revealed and alleges that due to the defamatory statements, he’s unable to write down and is unpublishable.
UBC later paid Galloway $167,000 in damages after an arbitrator discovered that sure communications by the college violated his privateness and broken his repute. He bought an additional $60,000 in supplemental damages for the continued breach of his privateness.
Galloway filed his defamation lawsuit in 2018 and A.B. and a dozen different defendants responded by submitting the anti-SLAPP utility.
Really helpful from Editorial
Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the information it’s essential to know — add VancouverSun.com and TheProvince.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
You may as well assist our journalism by changing into a digital subscriber: For simply $14 a month, you may get limitless entry to The Vancouver Solar, The Province, Nationwide Put up and 13 different Canadian information websites. Help us by subscribing right this moment: The Vancouver Solar | The Province.
Article content material