B.C. asks courtroom to dismiss Surrey case difficult change to Surrey Police from RCMP

Article content material

The B.C. authorities has requested the province’s Supreme Courtroom to throw out Surrey’s case in search of to maintain the RCMP.

In a response to town petition, filed in B.C. Supreme Courtroom, the province manufacturers town’s request for a overview of the directive that the Surrey Police Service take over from the RCMP as an pointless train.

Article content material

The province additionally calls town’s request for a judicial overview “moot” as a result of the federal government has handed a regulation that requires town to permit the transition to the brand new municipal drive from the Mounties.

Article content material

Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke and her metropolis council two months in the past filed the petition in courtroom, asking for a judicial overview of the provincial order, and later amended that petition, saying a change to a neighborhood drive violated the Canadian Constitution of Rights and Freedoms.

“This judicial overview ought to be dismissed as a result of Part 7 of the Police Modification Act 2023 has rendered it moot,” the province says, referring to a regulation handed within the lately accomplished fall session of the legislature. That part “now imposes a statuary obligation on town to supply policing via a municipal police division,” the submitting states.

And the submitting stated town’s argument that the Police Modification Act is unconstitutional — as a result of Locke ran and gained the final election on a retain-the-RCMP platform — would fail on two grounds.

The town says the amendments to the Police Act “intervene with Surrey voters’ expressed choice” and limits their freedom of expression, the province’s response says. However the way forward for policing wasn’t the one poll situation and it might’t be assumed Locke supporters have been additionally RCMP supporters, it stated.

Article content material

Article content material

Even when most Locke supporters have been additionally RCMP supporters, the province submitting says, there are clearly supporters of the municipal drive in Surrey.

“The expression of the bulk’s perspective,” the submitting says,” isn’t entitled to any higher safety (below the Constitution) than the expression of different views.”

The constitutional problem additionally lacks the “strong evidentiary report” required to succeed, it stated.

Public Security Minister Mike Farnworth final month suspended the whole Surrey Police Board and appointed an administrator, former Abbotsford police chief Mike Serr, to proceed the transition to the municipal drive.

The unprecedented transfer was made attainable by the current amendments to the Police Act, which provides the province the ability to nominate an administrator to hold out the police transition and take away members of the Surrey Police Board, together with the chair.

The Police Act adjustments additionally state that Surrey’s police drive of report would be the new Surrey Police Service, not the Surrey RCMP. Whereas the RCMP continues to be the police drive of jurisdiction in Surrey, the Surrey Police Service is already staffed by about 400 officers and workers.

Article content material

Farnworth estimates the transition, led by Serr and former B.C. Hydro CEO Jessica McDonald, who was employed in July to supervise the transition, will take one other 12 to 18 months to finish.

In July, Farnworth ordered Surrey to proceed with the transition, regardless of protests from Locke that the municipal drive would price taxpayers $464 million over 10 years. The province has provided $150 million to assist with the transition however Locke has stated it isn’t sufficient.

In its reply, the province notes that Farnworth has an “overarching duty to make sure that an ‘ample and efficient degree of policing and regulation enforcement is maintained by means of British Columbia.’

“In reaching his determination, the minister didn’t evaluate the efficacy of the SPS and RCMP,” the province’s courtroom submitting says. “The minister’s determination was grounded within the distinctive info of this unprecedented state of affairs. The minister discovered that town’s proposed U-turn may create a policing void in Surrey and have spillover penalties by means of British Columbia.”

It added that the RCMP already has about 1,500 vacancies in B.C. and Surrey appeared OK with the concept that restaffing the RCMP in that metropolis would come on the expense of filling these positions.

Article content material

The province additionally rejects Surrey’s argument that B.C.’s Group Constitution regulation means the province can solely drive town to stay with the Surrey Police Service if the province agrees to pay any further prices.

The province argues that the Police Act — which requires municipalities to pay “the bills essential to usually keep regulation and order — additionally comes into play. Additionally, the province notes, nearly any determination by the Public Security Minister below the Police Act may improve prices of policing for a municipality.

“The town’s idea would have the far-reaching consequence that the minister can’t make the choices he considers crucial to keep up ample and efficient policing, except the province can pay for any elevated prices. That is plainly not what the legislature supposed.”

Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the information it’s good to know — add VancouverSun.com and TheProvince.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.

You may as well assist our journalism by turning into a digital subscriber: For simply $14 a month, you will get limitless entry to The Vancouver Solar, The Province, Nationwide Put up and 13 different Canadian information websites. Help us by subscribing right this moment: The Vancouver Solar | The Province.

Article content material