Column: Purple flags have been waved about the way forward for inexperienced areas, together with some waterfront properties. If these issues have been misplaced, the mayor’s workplace was not answering questions Wednesday to dispel such notions
Article content material
As Vancouver’s council prepares to resolve the destiny of the town’s elected park board, questions stay round what this important change might imply for among the metropolis’s best-loved public areas.
Present and previous metropolis councillors and park board commissioners have been elevating purple flags this week about what Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim’s proposed new governance construction might imply for park lands that fall underneath varied classifications, which incorporates some iconic waterfront properties.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Article content material
Present park board commissioner Laura Christensen stated Wednesday she worries that the proposed modifications might make the roughly 40 per cent of Vancouver parks not formally categorized as “everlasting parks” open to sale, improvement, or “being something aside from a park, which is what it must be.”
“This safety that (Sim) has marketed … lulls the general public right into a false sense of safety that they’re not going to lose any inexperienced area,” stated Christensen, who was elected final yr to the park board underneath the ABC banner earlier than quitting the get together final week. “However their promise to do something doesn’t matter anymore, as a result of additionally they promised to not abolish the park board.”
If such issues are baseless, the mayor’s workplace was not answering questions Wednesday to dispel such notions.
It’s one in all a number of unanswered questions as the town hurtles towards a potential main change in its governance, solely every week after the general public — and even the elected board members themselves — have been shocked to be taught of the park board’s presumably imminent demise.
When Sim unveiled his plan final week to pursue the park board’s dissolution, he emphasised proposed measures to make sure the safety of the town’s cherished public parks.
Dawn
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Sim has offered his proposal as a means to enhance the administration of parks and recreation companies by eliminating a layer of forms.
He has additionally stated folding park operations underneath council jurisdiction would save hundreds of thousands of {dollars} yearly for the town. By Wednesday afternoon, as council ready to listen to from greater than 150 individuals signed up to discuss the mayor’s movement, no info had but been made public to assist Sim’s public claims about taxpayer financial savings related together with his proposal.
The unusually massive record of audio system was simply getting began Wednesday afternoon, with debate and a choice to comply with.
An in depth studying of the movement triggered some observers — together with previous metropolis councillors and park board commissioners, and no less than one lawyer — to take pause over a single phrase: “Everlasting.”
Sim’s proposal, as outlined in his movement, would ask the B.C. authorities to get rid of the elected park board of commissioners and provides all “powers at the moment bestowed on the park board” to metropolis council. Additional, Sim’s movement proposes a “course of for revoking and/or cancelling the designation of areas designated as everlasting public parks,” requiring a “unanimous vote of all council members, together with provisions for a public referendum.”
Commercial 4
Article content material
In an interview final week, Sim emphasised that requiring all 10 councillors and the mayor to log off on such a change is “an extremely excessive bar.”
“We would like everybody to know that so long as I’m mayor of the town, parks will at all times be parks, golf programs will at all times be golf programs,” Sim stated.
However some observers have latched onto the precise language round “areas designated as everlasting public parks.”
That’s as a result of whereas lots of Vancouver’s public areas are designated as everlasting parks, lots of its best-loved and most well-known parks and seashores don’t bear that formal “everlasting” designation. So what would Sim’s proposed framework imply for these different areas? The mayor’s workplace has not but answered that query.
A 2022 Vancouver park board stock lists the town’s parks and seashores designated as “everlasting” and “short-term.” Areas bearing the “short-term” designation embrace a part of Jericho Seaside, Sundown Seaside, in addition to Thunderbird Park and Foster Park in East Vancouver.
Postmedia requested Sim’s workplace for clarification on two factors: First, whether or not revoking the park designation for such short-term parks would require a unanimous vote of council and a referendum, or whether or not that particular safety was solely afforded to parks formally designated as everlasting. And second, whether or not altering the usage of parks not bearing the “everlasting” designation would solely require a easy majority vote of council.
Commercial 5
Article content material
Sim’s chief of workers Trevor Ford despatched an emailed assertion that didn’t reply both of these questions. As an alternative, the assertion learn, in full: “To be as clear, there isn’t any plan, nor will there ever be a plan underneath Mayor Sim, to promote or develop any of our parks for housing.”
Postmedia responded Wednesday morning, asking Ford and Sim’s press secretary once more if they might reply the 2 beforehand requested questions on what Sim’s plan would imply for any park land not formally designated “everlasting.”
No response had been obtained by deadline Wednesday.
Park’s completely different classifications stem from their completely different histories. Some land got here to be parks via bequeathments, or actual property developments. Parks formally designated as “everlasting” have probably the most safety — revoking their standing at the moment requires a two-thirds majority vote of each council and the park board.
Underneath the present system, short-term parks have much less safety, and their standing will be revoked by council with park board approval.
But when council tried to do this right now — for instance, revoking Sundown Seaside’s park standing — there may be at the moment one other elected physique, the park board, that might attempt to oppose the transfer, stated former Vancouver Inexperienced councillor and park commissioner Michael Wiebe, who opposes the mayor’s proposal.
Commercial 6
Article content material
“It’s a wholesome dialogue between two elected our bodies,” stated Wiebe, who deliberate to handle council Wednesday to oppose the transfer. “Just a little little bit of friction is useful to make sure the most effective curiosity of parks and pure areas.”
Tim Louis, a lawyer and former COPE Vancouver councillor, believes Sim’s proposal poses a menace to the way forward for the town’s public areas.
“Their swagger would have us imagine that remodeling the park board into the park division, and inserting it neatly between (all the opposite municipal departments) could have no destructive impact on the safety of our parks,” Louis stated. “And naturally, he’s completely fallacious.”
“This use of the phrase ‘everlasting’ may be very intelligent. It leaves the door vast open for parks that haven’t been designated as everlasting,” Louis stated. “So, say goodbye to half or all of Sundown Seaside.”
Associated Tales
Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the information it’s worthwhile to know — add VancouverSun.com and TheProvince.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
You can too assist our journalism by turning into a digital subscriber: For simply $14 a month, you will get limitless entry to The Vancouver Solar, The Province, Nationwide Put up and 13 different Canadian information websites. Assist us by subscribing right now: The Vancouver Solar | The Province.
Article content material